TY - JOUR
T1 - Low-frequency impact sound in CLT floors
T2 - Perceptual gains from beam integration
AU - Asakura, T.
AU - Mizunuma, H.
AU - Hiramitsu, A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2026
PY - 2026
Y1 - 2026
N2 - Low-frequency floor-impact noise is the principal acoustic shortcoming of cross-laminated-timber (CLT) construction, yet current single-number ratings are rooted in tapping-machine spectra and under-represent heavy/soft human impacts below 100 Hz. We couple a validated plate–beam finite-element model of a two-story CLT test building to a rectangular room-acoustic model and generate 12 auralized stimuli—three slab thicknesses (150, 210, and 270 mm) with and without mid-span and quarter-span beams, each excited by literature-based jump-type (1.2 kN, 20 ms) and run-type (0.6 kN, 30 ms) forces. The frequency-domain responses are converted to time waveforms via inverse FFT and reproduced, after full transfer-path equalization, to 20 normal-hearing adults in a semi-anechoic room. Psychophysical scaling employs magnitude estimation (ME) for all stimuli and paired comparison (PC) for the six jump-type cases, while the objective descriptor is the event maximum level LAFmax (ISO 717-2:2020, Annex D). Beam integration lowers LAFmax by 1.9, 1.3, and 5.9 dB for the 150, 210, and 270 mm slabs, respectively, with a mean reduction of 3.1 dB; thicker slabs are consistently quieter than thinner ones. ME geometric means correlate strongly with LAFmax (r = 0.88, semi-log fit, R2 = 0.77), and the PC loudness scale shows a comparable association (r = 0.85, R2 = 0.73), confirming that event-level attenuation translates directly to perceived quietness. Results demonstrate that beam integration is an effective structural lever for sub-100 Hz impact noise and that LAFmax, evaluated on simulation or rubber-ball tests, provides a perceptually grounded design metric that complements conventional ratings.
AB - Low-frequency floor-impact noise is the principal acoustic shortcoming of cross-laminated-timber (CLT) construction, yet current single-number ratings are rooted in tapping-machine spectra and under-represent heavy/soft human impacts below 100 Hz. We couple a validated plate–beam finite-element model of a two-story CLT test building to a rectangular room-acoustic model and generate 12 auralized stimuli—three slab thicknesses (150, 210, and 270 mm) with and without mid-span and quarter-span beams, each excited by literature-based jump-type (1.2 kN, 20 ms) and run-type (0.6 kN, 30 ms) forces. The frequency-domain responses are converted to time waveforms via inverse FFT and reproduced, after full transfer-path equalization, to 20 normal-hearing adults in a semi-anechoic room. Psychophysical scaling employs magnitude estimation (ME) for all stimuli and paired comparison (PC) for the six jump-type cases, while the objective descriptor is the event maximum level LAFmax (ISO 717-2:2020, Annex D). Beam integration lowers LAFmax by 1.9, 1.3, and 5.9 dB for the 150, 210, and 270 mm slabs, respectively, with a mean reduction of 3.1 dB; thicker slabs are consistently quieter than thinner ones. ME geometric means correlate strongly with LAFmax (r = 0.88, semi-log fit, R2 = 0.77), and the PC loudness scale shows a comparable association (r = 0.85, R2 = 0.73), confirming that event-level attenuation translates directly to perceived quietness. Results demonstrate that beam integration is an effective structural lever for sub-100 Hz impact noise and that LAFmax, evaluated on simulation or rubber-ball tests, provides a perceptually grounded design metric that complements conventional ratings.
KW - auralization
KW - beam integration
KW - CLT
KW - floor-impact sound
KW - low-frequency acoustics
KW - magnitude estimation
KW - paired comparison
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105030725880
U2 - 10.1177/1351010X261423668
DO - 10.1177/1351010X261423668
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105030725880
SN - 1351-010X
JO - Building Acoustics
JF - Building Acoustics
ER -