TY - JOUR
T1 - Improvement of Midpoint Imputation for Estimation of Median Survival Time for Interval-Censored Time-to-Event Data
AU - Nakagawa, Yuki
AU - Sozu, Takashi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Drug Information Association, Inc 2024.
PY - 2024/7
Y1 - 2024/7
N2 - Background: Progression-free survival (PFS) is used to evaluate treatment effects in cancer clinical trials. Disease progression (DP) in patients is typically determined by radiological testing at several scheduled tumor-assessment time points. This produces a discrepancy between the true progression time and the observed progression time. When the observed progression time is considered as the true progression time, a positively biased PFS is obtained for some patients, and the estimated survival function derived by the Kaplan–Meier method is also biased. Methods: While the midpoint imputation method is available and replaces interval-censored data with midpoint data, it unrealistically assumes that several DPs occur at the same time point when several DPs are observed within the same tumor-assessment interval. We enhanced the midpoint imputation method by replacing interval-censored data with equally spaced timepoint data based on the number of observed interval-censored data within the same tumor-assessment interval. Results: The root mean square error of the median of the enhanced method is almost always smaller than that of the midpoint imputation regardless of the tumor-assessment frequency. The coverage probability of the enhanced method is close to the nominal confidence level of 95% in most scenarios. Conclusion: We believe that the enhanced method, which builds upon the midpoint imputation method, is more effective than the midpoint imputation method itself.
AB - Background: Progression-free survival (PFS) is used to evaluate treatment effects in cancer clinical trials. Disease progression (DP) in patients is typically determined by radiological testing at several scheduled tumor-assessment time points. This produces a discrepancy between the true progression time and the observed progression time. When the observed progression time is considered as the true progression time, a positively biased PFS is obtained for some patients, and the estimated survival function derived by the Kaplan–Meier method is also biased. Methods: While the midpoint imputation method is available and replaces interval-censored data with midpoint data, it unrealistically assumes that several DPs occur at the same time point when several DPs are observed within the same tumor-assessment interval. We enhanced the midpoint imputation method by replacing interval-censored data with equally spaced timepoint data based on the number of observed interval-censored data within the same tumor-assessment interval. Results: The root mean square error of the median of the enhanced method is almost always smaller than that of the midpoint imputation regardless of the tumor-assessment frequency. The coverage probability of the enhanced method is close to the nominal confidence level of 95% in most scenarios. Conclusion: We believe that the enhanced method, which builds upon the midpoint imputation method, is more effective than the midpoint imputation method itself.
KW - Cancer clinical trial
KW - Interval censoring
KW - Median survival time
KW - Progression-free survival
KW - Survival analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85189919735&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s43441-024-00640-7
DO - 10.1007/s43441-024-00640-7
M3 - Article
C2 - 38598082
AN - SCOPUS:85189919735
SN - 2168-4790
VL - 58
SP - 721
EP - 729
JO - Therapeutic Innovation and Regulatory Science
JF - Therapeutic Innovation and Regulatory Science
IS - 4
ER -