TY - JOUR
T1 - Three closely related 1-[(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)methyl]-4-(halobenzoyl)piperazines
T2 - Similar molecular structures but different intermolecular interactions
AU - Mahesha, Ninganayaka
AU - Sagar, Belakavadi K.
AU - Yathirajan, Hemmige S.
AU - Furuya, Tetsundo
AU - Haraguchi, Tomoyuki
AU - Akitsu, Takashiro
AU - Glidewell, Christopher
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Mahesha et al. 2019.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - In each of the compounds 1-[(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)methyl]-4-(3-fluorobenzoyl)piperazine, C 19 H 19 FN 2 O 3 (I), 1-[(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)methyl]-4-(2,6-difluorobenzoyl)piperazine, C 19 H 18 F 2 N 2 O 3 (II), and 1-[(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)methyl]-4-(2,4-dichlorobenzoyl)piperazine, C 19 H 19 Cl 2 N 2 O 3 (III), the piperazine rings adopt a chair conformation with the (1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)methyl substituent occupying an equatorial site: the five-membered rings are all slightly folded across the O⋯O line leading to envelope conformations. The dihedral angle between the planar amidic fragment and the haloaryl ring is 62.97 (5)° in (I) but 77.72 (12)° and 75.50 (5)° in (II) and (III), respectively. Despite their similarity in constitution and conformation, the supramolecular interactions in (I)-(III) differ: in (I), a combination of C - H⋯O and C - H⋯π(arene) hydrogen bonds links the molecules into a three-dimensional framework structure, but there are no hydrogen bonds of any sort in either (II) or (III), although the structure of (III) contains a short Cl⋯Cl contact between inversion-related pairs of molecules.
AB - In each of the compounds 1-[(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)methyl]-4-(3-fluorobenzoyl)piperazine, C 19 H 19 FN 2 O 3 (I), 1-[(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)methyl]-4-(2,6-difluorobenzoyl)piperazine, C 19 H 18 F 2 N 2 O 3 (II), and 1-[(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)methyl]-4-(2,4-dichlorobenzoyl)piperazine, C 19 H 19 Cl 2 N 2 O 3 (III), the piperazine rings adopt a chair conformation with the (1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)methyl substituent occupying an equatorial site: the five-membered rings are all slightly folded across the O⋯O line leading to envelope conformations. The dihedral angle between the planar amidic fragment and the haloaryl ring is 62.97 (5)° in (I) but 77.72 (12)° and 75.50 (5)° in (II) and (III), respectively. Despite their similarity in constitution and conformation, the supramolecular interactions in (I)-(III) differ: in (I), a combination of C - H⋯O and C - H⋯π(arene) hydrogen bonds links the molecules into a three-dimensional framework structure, but there are no hydrogen bonds of any sort in either (II) or (III), although the structure of (III) contains a short Cl⋯Cl contact between inversion-related pairs of molecules.
KW - crystal structure
KW - hydrogen bonding
KW - molecular conformation
KW - piperazines
KW - supramolecular assembly
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85061119735
U2 - 10.1107/S2056989019000458
DO - 10.1107/S2056989019000458
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85061119735
SN - 2056-9890
VL - 75
SP - 202
EP - 207
JO - Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications
JF - Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications
ER -