TY - GEN
T1 - Methodology for Measurement in Vivo Ankle Joint Kinematics after Two Different Types of Total Ankle Arthroplasty
AU - Ikeda, Rea
AU - Kurokawa, Hiroaki
AU - Kosugi, Shinichi
AU - Tanaka, Yasuhito
AU - Yamamoto, Masataka
AU - Takemura, Hiroshi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 IEEE.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Revision surgery due to relatively high rates of loosening and implant subsidence is one of critical problems after total ankle arthroplasty (TAA). In Japan, ahead of the world, two types of TAA with differently shaped alumina ceramic implants are being used in recently. For one type, Standard TAA, an analysis of ankle joint kinematics after replacement has been performed. However, the method is specific to its implant for standard TAA, and ankle joint kinematics after the other type, Combined TAA, has not been analyzed or compared in terms of kinematics. In addition, the previous method has critical issue of reproducibility because it includes manual processes. The purpose of this study is to develop in vivo kinematics analysis method of ankle joint after Standard TAA and Combined TAA that can be used to compare them. Definition of reference systems using common implant shapes features enabled kinematics analysis independent of its shape. Also, calculating ankle joint kinematics using iterative closest point (ICP) algorithm enabled a uniform analysis without any manual processes. The proposed method allows comparison of ankle joint kinematics after Standard TAA and Combined TAA with automatically and reproducibility. The analysis results may lead to the development of optimal implant shapes.
AB - Revision surgery due to relatively high rates of loosening and implant subsidence is one of critical problems after total ankle arthroplasty (TAA). In Japan, ahead of the world, two types of TAA with differently shaped alumina ceramic implants are being used in recently. For one type, Standard TAA, an analysis of ankle joint kinematics after replacement has been performed. However, the method is specific to its implant for standard TAA, and ankle joint kinematics after the other type, Combined TAA, has not been analyzed or compared in terms of kinematics. In addition, the previous method has critical issue of reproducibility because it includes manual processes. The purpose of this study is to develop in vivo kinematics analysis method of ankle joint after Standard TAA and Combined TAA that can be used to compare them. Definition of reference systems using common implant shapes features enabled kinematics analysis independent of its shape. Also, calculating ankle joint kinematics using iterative closest point (ICP) algorithm enabled a uniform analysis without any manual processes. The proposed method allows comparison of ankle joint kinematics after Standard TAA and Combined TAA with automatically and reproducibility. The analysis results may lead to the development of optimal implant shapes.
KW - Ankle joint kinematics
KW - Osteoarthritis
KW - Total ankle arthroplasty
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85214984455&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/EMBC53108.2024.10782043
DO - 10.1109/EMBC53108.2024.10782043
M3 - Conference contribution
C2 - 40039047
AN - SCOPUS:85214984455
T3 - Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS
BT - 46th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC 2024 - Proceedings
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 46th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC 2024
Y2 - 15 July 2024 through 19 July 2024
ER -