TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of freestream turbulence on the secondary instability of the roughness-induced crossflow vortex in swept flat plate boundary layers
AU - Nakagawa, Kosuke
AU - Ishida, Takahiro
AU - Tsukahara, Takahiro
N1 - Funding Information:
K.N. was supported by JST (Japan Science and Technology Agency) SPRING (Support for Pioneering Research Initiated by the Next Generation), Grant Number JPMJSP2151 . We appreciate Professor Daisuke Watanabe at Toyama University for his valuable advice for simulating freestream turbulence. Some of the present numerical simulations utilized supercomputer resources at the Cybermedia Center, Osaka University, and the Cyberscience Center, Tohoku University.
Funding Information:
K.N. was supported by JST (Japan Science and Technology Agency) SPRING (Support for Pioneering Research Initiated by the Next Generation), Grant Number JPMJSP2151. We appreciate Professor Daisuke Watanabe at Toyama University for his valuable advice for simulating freestream turbulence. Some of the present numerical simulations utilized supercomputer resources at the Cybermedia Center, Osaka University, and the Cyberscience Center, Tohoku University.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s)
PY - 2023/8
Y1 - 2023/8
N2 - In a three-dimensional boundary layer with spanwise constant flow and chordwise acceleration, which is unique to the vicinity of the leading edge of a swept wing, an inviscid instability induces the crossflow vortex (CFV), around which a secondary instability further occurs to yield a turbulent transition. It is well known that surface roughness induces stationary CFVs and that CFVs are receptive to freestream turbulence (FST), but the interference of both effects remains unclear. To determine the transition mechanisms in mixed roughness and FST environments, we performed direct numerical simulations of a Falkner–Skan–Cooke boundary layer under various conditions considering the presence of cylindrical roughness and the peak FST wavelength. Without roughness, the FST with a long wavelength comparable to the most unstable mode promotes CFV induction, resulting in an earlier transition. Conversely, the short-wavelength FST interacts with a wake vortex induced by the presence of roughness, yielding a hairpin vortex as a secondary instability. We discuss the main production terms of the disturbance energy associated with each of the type-1 and -2 secondary instabilities, which are accompanied by finger and hairpin vortices, respectively. The rapid turbulent transition via the type-1 secondary instability is due to the spanwise velocity gradient of the developed CFV, whereas that via the type-2 is due to a wall-normal gradient and is similar to the fully developed wall turbulence. The wavelength of FST played a key role in inducing a high-frequency secondary instability on the CFV or the CFV itself, and the receptivity to FST differed between the CFV and wake vortex.
AB - In a three-dimensional boundary layer with spanwise constant flow and chordwise acceleration, which is unique to the vicinity of the leading edge of a swept wing, an inviscid instability induces the crossflow vortex (CFV), around which a secondary instability further occurs to yield a turbulent transition. It is well known that surface roughness induces stationary CFVs and that CFVs are receptive to freestream turbulence (FST), but the interference of both effects remains unclear. To determine the transition mechanisms in mixed roughness and FST environments, we performed direct numerical simulations of a Falkner–Skan–Cooke boundary layer under various conditions considering the presence of cylindrical roughness and the peak FST wavelength. Without roughness, the FST with a long wavelength comparable to the most unstable mode promotes CFV induction, resulting in an earlier transition. Conversely, the short-wavelength FST interacts with a wake vortex induced by the presence of roughness, yielding a hairpin vortex as a secondary instability. We discuss the main production terms of the disturbance energy associated with each of the type-1 and -2 secondary instabilities, which are accompanied by finger and hairpin vortices, respectively. The rapid turbulent transition via the type-1 secondary instability is due to the spanwise velocity gradient of the developed CFV, whereas that via the type-2 is due to a wall-normal gradient and is similar to the fully developed wall turbulence. The wavelength of FST played a key role in inducing a high-frequency secondary instability on the CFV or the CFV itself, and the receptivity to FST differed between the CFV and wake vortex.
KW - Crossflow vortex
KW - DNS
KW - Freestream turbulence
KW - FSC boundary layer
KW - Swept flat plate
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85160019006&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2023.109161
DO - 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2023.109161
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85160019006
SN - 0142-727X
VL - 102
JO - International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow
JF - International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow
M1 - 109161
ER -