A study of afterglow signatures in NaI and CsI scintillator modules for the background and transient observer instrument on COSI

Hannah Gulick, Hiroki Yoneda, Tadayuki Takahashi, Claire Chen, Kazuhiro Nakazawa, Shunsaku Nagasawa, Mii Ando, Keigo Okuma, Alyson Joens, Samer Al Nussirat, Yasuyuki Shimizu, Kaito Fujisawa, Takayoshi Kohmura, Kouichi Hagino, Hisashi Kitamura, Andreas Zoglauer, Juan Carlos Martinez Oliveros, John A. Tomsick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We present measurements of the afterglow signatures in NaI(Tl) and CsI(Tl) detector modules as part of the Background and Transient Observer (BTO) mission detector trade-study. BTO is a NASA Student Collaboration Project flying on the Compton Spectrometer and Imager (COSI) Small Explorer mission in 2027. The detectors utilized in this study are cylindrical in shape with a height and diameter of 5.1 cm and were read out by silicon photomultipliers (SiPMs). We conducted a radiation campaign at the HIMAC accelerator in Japan where the scintillators were irradiated with a 230 MeV/u helium beam (He beam) and 350 MeV/u carbon beam (C beam). We find that both the CsI and NaI scintillators exhibit afterglow signatures when irradiated with the C and He beams. The CsI crystal exhibits a stronger afterglow intensity with afterglow pulses occurring for an average 2.40 ms for C and 0.9 ms for He after the initial particle pulse. The duration of afterglow pulses in CsI is 8.6× and 5.6× the afterglow signal duration in NaI for C and He (0.28 ms and 0.16 ms, respectively). Although CsI has advantages such as a higher light yield and radiation hardness, the stronger afterglows in the CsI detector increase the complexity of the electronics and lead to a ∼7× larger dead time per afterglow event or a ∼3× higher energy threshold value. We use the measured dead times to predict the amount of observing time lost to afterglow-inducing events for an instrument like BTO in low Earth orbit. We simulate the background rates in a BTO-like orbit and find a total value of 114 counts/s for the full two-detector system. Based on the particle energies in the HIMAC experiment, we then determine that an event with sufficient energy to produce an afterglow signal occurs once every ∼70 s and ∼1.4 s in NaI and CsI detectors, respectively. Thus, we conclude that NaI is the better choice for the BTO mission.

Original languageEnglish
Article number165631
JournalNuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms
Volume561
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2025

Keywords

  • All-sky gamma-ray survey
  • Gamma-ray scintillators
  • Scintillator afterglow
  • Time-domain astrophysics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A study of afterglow signatures in NaI and CsI scintillator modules for the background and transient observer instrument on COSI'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this